Will Peter and Sue get added to this year’s malnutrition statistics?

Is the government rushing to close down the few remaining sources of help for people like Peter and Sue (not their real names), a couple who came into the London food bank last week? Both of them have serious health issues and their sickness benefits have been delayed.

Yesterday, the story broke that the £347m hardship fund, a potential safety net for the couple, is being scrapped. The Local Government Association (LGA) is calling for ministers to review the decision. The LGA says its abolition could leave councils unable to support families who face a crisis. The loss of the Local Welfare Assistance Fund would leave councils having to find money for this from their overall budgets. The government is reported as saying that councils will continue to give support to those in financial difficulties, but the LGA has highlighted that overall funding for local government has been cut by more than 40 per cent over the course of this parliament. Doing away with this fund could leave some areas unable to afford to help out people in crisis.

This development is not going to make life any easier for Peter and Sue, who usually get employment and support allowance (ESA), but had no way of feeding themselves last week. Peter, who is bipolar, had sent the sick note that he hopes would have triggered a renewal of ESA to an office in Ireland, but believes it’s been lost in the post. Before he can start receiving ESA again, he has to repeat the process of getting his key mental health worker to arrange an appointment with his psychiatrist. It’s easy to see that this is all going to take a while to sort. Sue, who is epileptic, had been friends with Peter for many years before they became a couple. They got together after she broke up with her ex-husband, who had been violent towards her. She doesn’t seem to know why her ESA has been delayed.

Both of them have older children from their previous relationships, and now Sue, 36, thinks she may be pregnant. The couple, who are clearly devoted to each other, are living together. Sue receives housing benefit and disability living allowance (DLA) in addition to ESA. With both sets of ESA now on hold, they are trying and failing to survive on Sue’s DLA of £41 a week. That sum has to cover rent, gas, electricity, council tax and food for two. Except of course, it isn’t covering food, which is why they’re here at the food bank.

They’re worried their gas and electricity are about to run out. That would leave them in a cold house, unable to heat up some of the tins of food we’re giving them. Our food bank manager Alan rang their energy supplier Utilita, which calls itself “the UK’s leading prepayment gas and electricity supplier”. He said they weren’t very interested in helping. “The couple had recently switched suppliers and this supplier (Utilita) did not seem to understand its responsibility to help vulnerable people and in any case could not act until their smart meter was installed.”

He added that in stark contrast, he contacted energy provider EDF the same day on behalf of another client, and they quickly agreed to provide an emergency supply of gas and electricity – £20 in each case. A bit of welcome good news. Well done EDF.

Getting help from the state seems to be getting harder and harder. Sue says that when they went to the job centre to use the phones, only one phone was left for clients to use. There used to be six lines available. The pair walked miles from their home to the job centre only to find they were unable to get help.

For Peter and Sue, life is very tough at the moment. Peter says they have both been “hungry the last week or two”. This is a particularly worrying development for someone who may be in the first three months of pregnancy. Life is a daily battle for survival. Peter says the key person who helps them is a local vicar. He’s the one who gave them a voucher for the food bank. “He’s understanding and he looks after us. He hates the government like I do. We are just oiks to them. If we get one less payment then the government saves a bit of money.”

The anger expressed by Peter’s vicar is being writ large across the nation. The open letter published in the Daily Mirror last week signed by 27 Anglican bishops is scathing about the Coalition’s “cutbacks to and failures in the benefit system” that have left half a million people visiting food banks since last Easter. It also says that 5,500 people were admitted to hospital in the UK with malnutrition last year. Peter and Sue are in danger of being included in this year’s malnutrition statistics.

Advertisements

12 thoughts on “Will Peter and Sue get added to this year’s malnutrition statistics?

    1. Clients seem to be getting into more hardship as the months go on. It’s hard to see how this couple can get back on an even keel. We can only supply a maximum of three emergency packs of food, so let’s hope ESA payments are restored very soon.

  1. This is sickening – it’s so very wrong 😦 This should not be happening in 2014 in a supposedly rich country!!
    Why aren’t these stories on the news and on TV? Why are we letting this government get away with this?
    I so hope that this couple, and others like them, will have their benefits given back to them asap.
    I only wish that I could help in some way.

    1. Thanks for the support and your help in getting these stories to a wider audience. I’m going to post next about a project in south-east London that’s helping provide a hot meal to 100-150 vulnerable people once a week. But feeding people, though vital, is only one aspect of what’s going on here. They offer a really holistic range of help (debt advice, addiction support groups, men’s groups, all-round emotional and if they want it spiritual support). Brilliant work is happening at this church, but its a terribly sad indictment of life in our rich (for some) capital city. Street sleeping is a growing problem in London, and the church project helps a number of those who are homeless. The guy who helps run the project is incandescent with rage at the damage government policies are causing to society. He’s got some important views about food banks and their limitations too. Despite the dire financial constraints on local authorities, the local council is doing what it can to get stuck in and help these people, and I’ll write more about that too.

    1. Trussell Trust food banks do this because their aim has always been to help clients through a short term crisis (and in more than half of cases this seems to happen when when state benefits have been sanctioned/stopped. They don’t want food banks to become a long term solution to the decline of the welfare state. As the demand for food banks increases significantly, it sees its role as a ‘voice for the people ‘ – an independent charity, not the contractual arm of the welfare state. TT is EXTREMELY wary of entering into any contractual agreement to provide welfare services. Hope this helps Niki.

  2. Very nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wished to mention that I have really enjoyed browsing your weblog posts.
    After all I’ll be subscribing for your rss feed and I hope you write
    again very soon!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s